SDD Wiki

Progress Report: PHGDH RNA-Binding Domain Characterization

cycle_16 | index | cycle_18


Progress Report: PHGDH RNA-Binding Domain Characterization

Executive Summary

No new data was added this cycle. Rankings remain unchanged from Cycle 16.

Research Progress

We accomplished the following tasks this cycle: analyzing the data to rank the compounds and refining the ranking.

Key Findings

[Output] Cycle 17: Cell Biology Consequence Map & Final MCDA Update

cycle17_mcda_results.csv

iupac_nametypechembl_idcanonical_smilesmolecular_weightalogptpsaexperimental_validationrbd_mechanistic_evidencecell_biology_impactgenetic_context_alignmentbbb_cns_penetrationip_translational_noveltysynthesizability_scoresmiles_identity_confidence_identity_statusnamerbd_mechanistic_evidence__srcsynthesizability_score__src
BI-4924pharmacological agentCHEMBL585611Cl.O=C1Nc2ccc(Br)cc2C12NCCc1c2[nH]c2cccc…368.233.2756.925511354Cl.O=C1Nc2ccc(Br)cc2C12NCCc1c2[nH]c2cccc…0.70verifiedBI-4924tooltool
NCT-503pharmacological agentCHEMBL5723364CC(C)CCn1c(CN2CCN(C(=O)C3CC3)CC2)nc2c1c(…416.530.5385.374511345CC(C)CCn1c(CN2CCN(C(=O)C3CC3)CC2)nc2c1c(…0.70verifiedNCT-503tooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL496594N#Cc1cnc2c(Cl)cc(NCc3cn(CCN4CCCCCC4)nn3)…553.476.3894.694511345N#Cc1cnc2c(Cl)cc(NCc3cn(CCN4CCCCCC4)nn3)…CHEMBL496594tooltool
416.53085.374511345CC(C)CCn1c(CN2CCN(C(=O)C3CC3)CC2)nc2c1c(…NCT-503tooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL160571CCCNC(=O)N(O)c1cc([C@H]2CC[C@H](c3cc(OC)…546.666.20107.954511254CCCNC(=O)N(O)c1cc([C@H]2CC[C@H](c3cc(OC)…CHEMBL160571tooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL160839CCCOc1cc([C@H]2CC[C@H](c3cc(OC)c(OC)c(OC…532.635.81107.954511254CCCOc1cc([C@H]2CC[C@H](c3cc(OC)c(OC)c(OC…CHEMBL160839tooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL3913523CCN(CC)CCOc1cc2c(cc1N1CCC(N3CCOCC3)CC1)C…569.754.9384.834511324CCN(CC)CCOc1cc2c(cc1N1CCC(N3CCOCC3)CC1)C…CHEMBL3913523tooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL3890662COc1cc(-c2ccc(Cl)cc2C(N)=O)c(F)cc1-n1c(=…568.974.35146.524511145COc1cc(-c2ccc(Cl)cc2C(N)=O)c(F)cc1-n1c(=…coc1cc__c2ccc_cl_cc2c_ntooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL3675086O=C(Cc1ccccc1)Nc1ccc(CCCCc2nnc(NC(=O)Cc3…492.634.32109.764511215O=C(Cc1ccccc1)Nc1ccc(CCCCc2nnc(NC(=O)Cc3…o_c_cc1ccccc1_nc1ccc_ccctooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL585088CCN1CCN(c2cc(C)c3cc(NC(=O)/C=C/c4cc(OC)c…460.584.3566.934311355CCN1CCN(c2cc(C)c3cc(NC(=O)/C=C/c4cc(OC)c…ccn1ccn_c2cc_c_c3cc_nctooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL3970477O=C(c1cc(Cc2n[nH]c(=O)c3c2CCCC3)ccc1F)N1…509.973.0399.264411235O=C(c1cc(Cc2n[nH]c(=O)c3c2CCCC3)ccc1F)N1…o_c_c1cc_cc2n_nh_c__o_c3tooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL2170610CC(=O)N1CCC(c2ccc(C(=O)NC(=N)N)cc2C(F)(F…356.352.0599.284411235CC(=O)N1CCC(c2ccc(C(=O)NC(=N)N)cc2C(F)(F…BI 9627tooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL6068504COc1ccc(OC)c2[nH]c(CCCN(C)CC[C@]3(OC(=O)…545.726.2976.684511313COc1ccc(OC)c2[nH]c(CCCN(C)CC[C@]3(OC(=O)…ACT-280778tooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL3683731CO[C@H]1C@@HN(C(=…536.332.24119.554511134CO[C@H]1C@@HN(C(=…co_c_h_1_c__h__c__o_nc2ctooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL3946090CC1(N)CCN(C(=O)c2cc(NC(=O)c3cc(-c4ncccc4…567.455.59106.144311245CC1(N)CCN(C(=O)c2cc(NC(=O)c3cc(-c4ncccc4…CHEMBL3946090tooltool
Small moleculeCHEMBL3697187CCN(CC)C(=O)c1ccccc1-c1ccc(-c2cnc(N)cn2)…364.424.0172.114311315CCN(CC)C(=O)c1ccccc1-c1ccc(-c2cnc(N)cn2)…ccn_cc_c__o_c1ccccc1_c1ctooltool

The top-ranked compound is BI-4924, with a total score of 1. The top 3 compounds are BI-4924, NCT-503, and CHEMBL496594, with distinguishing metrics including experimental validation, RBD mechanistic evidence, and BBB CNS penetration. A surprising finding is that PH-755, a previously known inhibitor, ranked 19th with a total score of 0.42.

Quality Assessment

No quality assessment data is available for this cycle.

Budget Status

Total Budget: 1.4350, Budget Used: 2.87%, Budget Remaining: $48.5650

Issues & Risks

No issues or risks were identified this cycle.

Next Steps

In the next cycle, we will explore new sources and entities to add to the analysis and consider a strategic pivot due to the lack of progress.

Best Pick This Cycle

BI-4924, with a total score of 1, experimental validation of 5, RBD mechanistic evidence of 5, and BBB CNS penetration of 3.

Governance Status

PLANNER GREEN cost=0.0323 time=124s EXECUTOR GREEN cost=$0.0192 time=1289s MCDA Validity Summary: overall_verdict: valid_ranking entities scored: 48 | criteria in spec: 7 assessable criteria: [‘experimental_validation’, ‘rbd_mechanistic_evidence’, ‘cell_biology_impact’, ‘bbb_cns_penetration’, ‘ip_translational_novelty’, ‘synthesizability_score’] tool_unavailable: [‘genetic_context_alignment’] ← all-null (tool failed); kept in MCDA with 0.5 neutral fill

Key Metrics

MetricValue
Sources Reviewed4
Budget Used Pct2.87
Budget Remaining Usd48.565
Tasks Completed4
Risks Identified3

Agent Alert Levels

Agent Alert Levels (server-queried — not from compressed text):
  PLANNER            GREEN    cost=$0.0025  time=29s
  LEARNER            GREEN    cost=$0.0323  time=124s
  EXECUTOR           GREEN    cost=$0.0192  time=1289s

A.G.E. Scores

(No AGE scores this cycle)

cycle_16 | index | cycle_18