Alzheimer’s Disease
Neurodegenerative disease. Major topic across Nobel panels — Session IV and Session XII.
The Amyloid Paradox
- Antibodies (lecanemab) can make brains essentially plaque-free — yet cognitive decline only slows by 27% (Südhof, Session XII)
- Most Alzheimer’s patients carry APOE4/APOE3 defects, not APP mutations (Schekman, Session IV)
- The field spent decades and billions on the wrong frontier
Südhof’s iPSC Data
- APP Swedish mutation in iPSC neurons: increased synapse density and synaptic events — not loss
- A-beta 40: consistently increased synapse formation; A-beta 42 toxic only at aggregation concentrations
- Pre-synaptic compartment selectively shrinks before neuron death
- “We don’t actually know whether the little beneficial effect was due to decrease in plaques — or increase in free A-beta — or both”
Alternative Approaches
- Baker: designed tau binders that suppress/disassemble fibrils; bioPROTAC for complete tau clearance; designed TDP-43 protease
- Südhof: drugs that promote synaptic connectivity rather than modulating receptors
- Südhof: would invest in integrative cell biology bridging atomic and whole-organism scales — reconcile the inflammation and amyloid camps
Cross-References
- Translation cliff — animal models for neurodegeneration are a persistent failure point
- LRRK2 — related neurodegenerative target in Parkinson’s
- Bertozzi’s glycoscience BBB shuttle may be relevant
Related sdd-wiki Content
- Amyloid-Beta (Aβ) — existing sdd-wiki concept hub on Aβ biology
- Neurometabolic Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s — PHGDH-linked metabolic perspective
Comments